Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42675327›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Minimal symbol grounding through language statistics: An information theoretic approach quantifying uncertainty.

Max M Louwerse

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Max M LouwerseDepartment of Computational Cognitive Science, Tilburg University, Warandelaan 2, Tilburg, 5037 AB, The Netherlands. M.M.Louwerse@tilburguniversity.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the fundamental issues in the cognitive sciences concerns the question of how language attains meaning. The current study investigated how the extent to which language statistics and symbol grounding reduce uncertainty about word meaning can be quantified. Using Shannon's information theory, conditional entropy of the valence of a word was quantified without grounding (baseline), with minimal symbol grounding and with full grounding. By using a mini lexicon as a principled illustration, later extended to a full lexicon, the entropy of phonological cues, frequency cues, and word embeddings were compared to a symbol-grounding case when predicting word valence. Phonology and frequency provided small but measurable reductions in uncertainty, which word embeddings propagated through a lexical network, particularly once only a few seed words were grounded. The results show that minimal grounding, combined with language-statistical structure, can substantially reduce uncertainty about word valence. The evidence of minimal symbol grounding sheds light on the symbol-grounding problem and encourages new and quantifiable perspectives on past and present theories on language and cognition.

Indexed as

Information TheoryLanguageHumansUncertaintyEmbodied cognitionInformation theoryLanguageLanguage statisticsSymbol grounding

Identifiers

PMID42675327
PMCPMC13529850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.