ReviewSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2026
Chemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia: from "platelet counting" to ecological repair of the bone marrow.
Review in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveChemotherapy-induced thrombocytopenia (CIT) is a dose-limiting toxicity that can necessitate chemotherapy delays or dose reductions. This review examines evidence that CIT involves injury to both megakaryocytes (MKs) and the bone marrow microenvironment (BMME) and considers the implications for thrombopoietin receptor agonist (TPO-RA) therapy.
methodsPubMed was searched for English-language literature without a publication-date restriction and was comprehensively updated through August 10, 2026. Evidence concerning CIT mechanisms and the mechanistic effects of TPO-RAs was integrated through a predefined narrative thematic framework, with explicit consideration of the directness of evidence for human CIT.
resultsAvailable studies suggest that TPO-RAs may have effects beyond platelet production, although evidence for vascular, metabolic, and immune microenvironmental effects derives largely from non-CIT or preclinical settings. Persistent rather than nadir CIT, lower endogenous thrombopoietin, and the absence of marrow infiltration, prior pelvic irradiation, or temozolomide exposure may enrich for response. A 2026 phase 3 trial directly demonstrated that romiplostim reduced CIT-induced chemotherapy dose modifications in persistent CIT, but biomarker-guided selection remains to be validated.
conclusionThe "seed and soil" model organizes previously published evidence and should be regarded as hypothesis-generating in human CIT. Prospective studies are needed before microenvironment-directed combinations or CIT-specific biomarker thresholds can be recommended.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.