GuidelineSurgical endoscopy2026
SAGES clinical practice guidelines for the management of symptomatic walled-off pancreatic necrosis.
Guideline in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
23 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundWalled-off pancreatic necrosis (WOPN) is a serious sequela following acute pancreatitis with significant associated morbidity and mortality. These guidelines provide best practice recommendations for the management of this complication. METHODOLOGY: A systematic review was conducted, including a literature search from 1/1/2020 to 1/24/2025, addressing four key questions regarding the management of WOPN in adults. The findings were subsequently presented to a multidisciplinary panel of surgeons, gastroenterologists, and interventional radiologists, including those from both the Society of American Gastrointestinal and Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) and the Americas Hepato-Pancreato-Biliary Association (AHPBA). The GRADE methodology was then used to develop evidence-based recommendations.
resultsAll recommendations were based on very low certainty of evidence. A conditional recommendation was made for endoscopic management versus image-guided intervention. A conditional recommendation was made for image-guided intervention versus open surgery. A conditional recommendation was made for either minimally invasive surgery or image-guided intervention. A conditional recommendation was made for minimally invasive surgery versus endoscopic intervention. A conditional recommendation was made for either a pure endoscopic approach versus a step-up approach.
conclusionsThese recommendations provide guidance for the approach to the management of WOPN according to the existing literature and expert input. The panel also highlighted evidence gaps to support future research for a stronger evidence base regarding the treatment of WOPN.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42675307What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.