Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42675299›Full record

GuidelineSurgical endoscopy2026

European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) Clinical Practice Guidelines Committee: standard operating procedure.

Bright Huo, Ourania Koutsiouroumpa, Francesco Carrano, Dimitris Mavridis, Alexander A Tzanis, Konstantinos Perivoliotis, Suzanne Dore, Maria Bigaki, Stavros A Antoniou

Abstract readPractice Guideline
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Guideline in Surgical endoscopy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Bright HuoDivision of General Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, 50 Charlton Ave. E., Hamilton, ON, L8N 1Y3, Canada. brighthuo@dal.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4999-4328
Ourania KoutsiouroumpaGuidelines Committee, European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Francesco CarranoGuidelines Committee, European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Dimitris MavridisGuidelines Committee, European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Alexander A TzanisGuidelines Committee, European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Konstantinos PerivoliotisGuidelines Committee, European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Suzanne DoreGuidelines Committee, European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Maria BigakiGuidelines Committee, European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Stavros A AntoniouGuidelines Committee, European Association for Endoscopic Surgery, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe European Association of Endoscopic Surgery (EAES) promotes surgical innovation, education, and quality assurance to optimize patient care. A core component of this work is the development of clinical practice guidelines.

methodsWe outline the standard operating procedure for clinical practice guideline development within the EAES. We adhere to standards outlined by the Guidelines International Network (GIN), core Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE), and Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation for guidelines of surgical interventions (AGREE-S). PROCESS: For all guidelines, the panel prioritizes outcomes and establishes decision thresholds for each PICO by converting utility values to absolute effect difference thresholds. Next, the systematic review group performs a comprehensive systematic review followed by a meta-analysis and/or network meta-analysis including rating of the certainty of evidence in line with core GRADE. An interdisciplinary panel of interest holders including patient partners then reviews this evidence using summary of findings tables and develops recommendations using the GRADE evidence-to-decision framework under the guidance of a guideline methodologist.

conclusionEAES develops clinical practice guidelines according to the highest methodological standards to summarize evidence and provide health recommendations for a wide range of interest holders including clinicians, patients, researchers, and policymakers.

Indexed as

EndoscopyEuropeHumansClinical practice guidelinesEAESMethodologySystematic review

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.