Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42675295›Full record

ArticleEuropean geriatric medicine2026

The development of the European Geriatric Medicine Specialty Exam.

Román Romero-Ortuño, Mario Barbagallo, Sylvie Bonin-Guillaume, A Mark Clarfield, Jugdeep Dhesi, Sofia Duque, Maria Victoria Farré Mercadé, Albert Ferro, Christophe Graf, Olivier Guerin and 16 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European geriatric medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Román Romero-OrtuñoDiscipline of Medical Gerontology, School of Medicine, Trinity College Dublin, Mercer's Institute for Successful Ageing, St James's Hospital, Dublin 8, Dublin, Ireland. romeroor@tcd.ie.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3882-7447
Mario BarbagalloGeriatric Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Palermo, Palermo, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1349-6530
Sylvie Bonin-GuillaumeService de Médecine Interne Gériatrie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Marseille, Marseille, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8514-6273
A Mark ClarfieldFaculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0388-5663
Jugdeep DhesiFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0815-0233
Sofia DuqueDepartment of Internal Medicine, Hospital CUF Descobertas, Lisbon, Portugal.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9273-5650
Maria Victoria Farré MercadéMedicine Department, Universitat Internacional de Catalunya (UIC Barcelona), Barcelona, Spain.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2903-2682
Albert FerroFaculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, School of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5486-9145
Christophe GrafDepartment of Readaptation and Geriatrics, Geneva University Hospitals, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0235-5046
Olivier GuerinService de Médecine Gériatrique Aiguë, CHU de Nice, Hôpital de Cimiez, Nice, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7929-9081
Hege Beate Ihle-HansenDepartment of Acute Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6298-9799
Anna Björg JónsdóttirDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Landspitali University Hospital, Reykjavík, Iceland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3986-3623
Jūratė MacijauskienėLithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, Lithuania.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9343-2010
Jean-Pierre MichelUniversity of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0718-4394
Thomas MünzerUniversity of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1891-1171
Maria S NuotioDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Turku, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8050-6084
Karolina PiotrowiczDepartment of Internal Medicine and Gerontology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Kraków, Poland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4760-8588
M Cristina PolidoriAgeing Clinical Research, Department II of Internal Medicine and Centre for Molecular Medicine Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8881-904X
Regina Roller-WirnsbergerDepartment of Internal Medicine, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1273-6520
Katrin SinglerDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Klinikum Fürth, Fürth, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5542-9582
Divya TiwariUniversity Hospitals Dorset NHS Foundation Trust, Dorset, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-8303-9403
Eva TopinkováDepartment of Geriatrics, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6786-4116
Rozemarijn Van Bruchem-VisserDepartment of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6833-7641
Marianne van IerselDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4329-6465
Michael VassalloBournemouth University and University Hospitals Dorset, Dorset, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3474-3713
Tahir MasudNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust, Nottingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1061-2898

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo describe the development of the European Geriatric Medicine Specialty Exam (EGeMSE), from its early conception within the European Union of Medical Specialists-Geriatric Medicine Section (UEMS-GMS) to implementation of the first pilot examinations.

methodsThis narrative article was based on a review of UEMS-GMS meeting minutes, European Geriatric Medicine Society (EuGMS) educational documents, appendices, reports, presentations, policy documents, and other relevant archival and publicly available sources. The evolution of the EGeMSE was reconstructed chronologically.

resultsDiscussions regarding a European Geriatric Medicine examination began in 2003 and evolved through successive working groups addressing postgraduate training, curricula, and assessment. During the following decade, the initiative became closely linked to development of a common European postgraduate curriculum and collaborative educational structures involving the UEMS-GMS, EuGMS, European Academy for Medicine of Ageing, International Association of Gerontology and Geriatrics-European Region, and other organisations. From 2018 onwards, the UEMS-GMS proposed a formal partnership with the British Geriatrics Society and the Federation of the Royal Colleges of Physicians of the United Kingdom, enabling adaptation of an established examination model to create a two-paper, multiple-choice, English-language European postgraduate examination. Following the first pilot examination in April 2025, the EGeMSE was recommended as a benchmark assessment of specialist knowledge within the 2025 European Training Requirements for the Specialty of Geriatric Medicine.

conclusionThe EGeMSE represents the culmination of more than 2 decades of European collaboration and provides a voluntary benchmark for specialist knowledge that supports the harmonisation of postgraduate Geriatric Medicine education across Europe.

Indexed as

CurriculumEuropeEuropean Geriatric Medicine Specialty Exam (EGeMSE)Geriatric medicineGraduate medical educationKnowledge certification

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.