ArticleJournal of imaging informatics in medicine2026
CARE: Multimodal Alignment Learning for Ophthalmic Imaging via Joint Optimal-Transport Soft Matching and Graph Neural ODE Refinement.
Article in Journal of imaging informatics in medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Medical artificial intelligence (AI) has shown great potential for the early screening and accurate diagnosis of fundus diseases. However, diagnostic methods based on single-modality retinal images still have clear limitations. Two-dimensional (2D) fundus images, including color fundus photography (CFP) and near-infrared (NIR) fundus images, capture superficial retinal morphology, vascular distribution, and lesion appearance, but they are insufficient for revealing deep microstructural changes. In contrast, optical coherence tomography (OCT) can characterize retinal layered structures and pathological deformations, yet lacks a comprehensive description of the overall fundus appearance. As a result, single-modality methods are often constrained by incomplete information in diagnosing complex retinal diseases. To exploit complementary information across modalities, multimodal approaches integrating fundus images and OCT have attracted increasing attention. However, learning reliable soft correspondence distributions between two-dimensional fundus images and OCT regions remains challenging. Due to substantial differences in imaging principles, spatial representations, and semantic granularity, complex many-to-many nonlinear correspondences commonly exist between the two modalities. Existing implicit attention-based fusion methods generally construct cross-modal interactions through independently normalized attention distributions, without explicitly imposing bilateral marginal constraints on the correspondence between fundus and OCT tokens. This may lead to unbalanced token utilization and modality dominance under noise interference or modality conflict, thereby limiting the stability of multimodal fusion. To address these issues, we propose a multimodal fundus disease diagnosis method based on progressive optimization of probabilistic correspondences. Specifically, entropy-regularized optimal transport is used to construct soft correspondence distributions between fundus image and OCT regions, while a unified graph structure and graph neural ordinary differential equation iteratively refine cross-modal alignment. In addition, modality-coupled contrastive learning is introduced to enhance disease discrimination and grading consistency. Experiments on the GAMMA and OLIVES datasets show that CARE achieves improved accuracy and Cohen's kappa under public benchmark settings, and demonstrates robustness under the evaluated noise perturbation and limited-data scenarios. Quantitatively, CARE achieved ACC/Kappa values of 0.860/0.893 on the GAMMA dataset and 1.000/1.000 on the OLIVES dataset. Statistical comparisons supported the main performance differences under the corresponding evaluation settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42675274What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.