ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
The Inbox Problem: Standardized Protocols for Primary Care Teams to Address Patient Messages.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPrimary care clinicians (PCPs) receive a high volume of patient messages through the electronic health record (EHR) inbox, which negatively impacts PCP well-being and retention. While recommendations to address the inbox problem have focused on leveraging care teams to address patient messages, there is limited evidence on how implementing standardized protocols for care teams impacts PCP workload.
objectiveTo measure the impact on PCPs' workload of a quality improvement initiative using standardized protocols for primary care medical assistants and nurses to respond to patient medical advice requests (PMARs).
designWe performed a quasi-experimental pre-intervention/post-intervention study of this quality improvement initiative.
participantsPCPs at 11 primary care clinics within a large academic health system.
interventionA cost-neutral quality improvement initiative integrated standardized protocols embedded within the EHR to existing primary care clinical staff PMAR workflows. MAIN MEASURES: The primary study outcome was the percentage of PMARs received by PCPs. We performed multivariable mixed-effect regression analysis to control for potential confounders and clustering by PCP. KEY
resultsThe percentage of PMARs received by a PCP decreased from 61.6% in the pre-intervention period to 57.6% in the post-intervention period (p < 0.001). In a multivariable mixed-effect model, the odds that a PCP received a PMAR post-intervention was lower than pre-intervention period (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.82-0.84), which corresponded to a 4.6% reduction in the adjusted means of the percentage of PMARs received by PCP between the pre- and post-intervention period.
conclusionIntegrating standardized protocols into primary care clinical staff workflows was associated with a modest reduction in PCP workload. However, PCPs received more than half of all patient messages.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42675245What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.