Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42675243›Full record

ArticlePsychonomic bulletin & review2026

Beyond the unitary self: Behavioral and drift-diffusion modeling evidence for a true self-prioritization effect and intra-self competition.

Yue Zhao, Fei Wang

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Psychonomic bulletin & review, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yue ZhaoDepartment of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5253-7745
Fei WangDepartment of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing, 100084, China. wf3126@mail.tsinghua.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5787-1518

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While the self-prioritization effect (SPE) - the enhanced processing of self-relevant stimuli - is well established, current models typically treat the self as a monolithic entity, overlooking the cognitive dynamics between different self-representations. This study investigated whether the true self, conceptualized as the central core of identity, commands a distinct processing advantage. Across three experiments using a shape-label matching paradigm, we documented a robust true self-prioritization effect (TSPE). Crucially, we observed a pattern of competitive dynamics: while the general self showed prioritization when presented in isolation (Experiment 2), its processing advantage was abolished in the presence of the true self (Experiment 1), a finding shown to be distinct from conceptual ambiguity (Experiment 3). Computational analyses using the hierarchical drift diffusion model (HDDM) revealed that these effects were primarily driven by differences in the rate of evidence accumulation (drift rate). These findings are consistent with a hierarchical account, in which the self-concept is not cognitively flat but hierarchically organized, with the true self functioning as a salient contextual anchor that marginalizes peripheral self-aspects to optimize decision making.

Indexed as

Models, PsychologicalSelf ConceptHumansYoung AdultDrift–diffusion modelSelf-prioritizationShape–label matching paradigmTrue self

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.