ReviewNeurology and therapy2026
Artificial Intelligence in Neuromuscular Diseases: Opportunities for a Data-Scarce Field.
Review in Neurology and therapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neuromuscular diseases (NMDs) encompass over 800 distinct entities affecting approximately one in 1000 individuals worldwide, with progressive muscle weakness, atrophy, and motor impairment as primary clinical manifestations. The rarity of most NMDs creates fundamental challenges for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) applications that typically require large-scale datasets. In this narrative review we synthesize the literature published between 2018 and 2025 on AI applications across the NMD spectrum, organized by clinical application domain. We examine how AI has advanced diagnostic capabilities through genetic variant interpretation, muscle magnetic resonance imaging analysis, electromyography-based classification, and computational pathology. In disease monitoring and prognosis, wearable-derived digital biomarkers have achieved regulatory qualification (US Food and Drug Administration [FDA] and European Medicines Agency [EMA]) as clinical trial endpoints for Duchenne muscular dystrophy, while AI-driven survival models for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) have been validated across 14 European centers. Proteomic and multi-omics analyses using ML have identified diagnostic panels for ALS. However, most reported models were developed and internally validated on single-center datasets, and few have undergone external or prospective validation or clinical implementation. Despite these achievements, research intensity varies dramatically across NMD subtypes, with ALS and Duchenne muscular dystrophy dominating while myotonic dystrophy, congenital myopathies, and metabolic myopathies remain virtually unexplored. Critical gaps persist in computational pathology, multi-center validation, and clinical translation. In this review, we discuss how federated learning, international collaborative networks (TREAT-NMD, Solve-RD, EURO-NMD), and foundation models can address these challenges, and propose directions for future AI-enhanced clinical studies in this data-scarce field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.