ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2026
Apparent diffusion coefficient radiomics for differentiating benign and malignant PI-RADS 3-5 prostate lesions: external validation.
Article in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo develop and externally validate a simplified apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)-based MRI radiomics model for differentiating benign and malignant Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 3-5 lesions and assess its incremental value beyond clinical predictors.
methodsThis retrospective multicenter study included 340 patients assigned to training (n = 182), internal test (n = 71), and external validation (n = 87) cohorts. Radiomics features were extracted from ADC maps and underwent reproducibility filtering and training-only feature selection. Four machine-learning classifiers were compared using nested cross-validation. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA), PSA density (PSAD), and PI-RADS were evaluated individually, and clinical and combined clinical-radiomics models were constructed.
resultsLogistic regression was selected as the final radiomics classifier. The radiomics model achieved area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values of 0.712 and 0.679 in the internal test and external validation cohorts, respectively. Corresponding AUCs were 0.775 and 0.777 for the clinical model and 0.829 and 0.808 for the combined model. The combined model did not significantly outperform the clinical model (Holm-adjusted P = 0.123 and 0.392, respectively) and showed an external specificity of 0.538.
conclusionADC radiomics provided complementary information for differentiating benign and malignant PI-RADS 3-5 prostate lesions, but its incremental value beyond the clinical model was limited. Further prospective multicenter validation is warranted before clinical implementation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42675219What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.