Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42675198›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Workplace ostracism and job performance: revisiting the limits of employee engagement in addressing workplace exclusion.

Kailash Kumar Sahu, Ravi Kumar Mishra, Tushar Ranjan Sahoo, Shreya Kushwaha

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Kailash Kumar SahuSymbiosis Institute of Business Management, Nagpur Campus Symbiosis International (Deemed University), Pune, India. kailash.sahu@sibmnagpur.edu.in.ORCID 0000-0002-8741-3435
Ravi Kumar MishraDepartment of Business Management, Pandit Shambhunath Shukla University, Shahdol, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID 0000-0003-2093-8808
Tushar Ranjan SahooAmity Business School Amity University Chhattisgarh Raipur, Chhattisgarh, 493225, India.ORCID 0000-0002-8453-8179
Shreya KushwahaSchool of Business, Galgotias University, Greater Noida, 203201, India.ORCID 0009-0005-4938-8653

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Workplace ostracism represents a subtle but damaging form of workplace exclusion that can weaken employees' psychological functioning and job-related outcomes. Drawing on self-regulation theory (SRT), this study examines the association between workplace ostracism and employee job performance and investigates whether employee engagement moderates this relationship. Data were collected from 477 employees working in IT, banking and insurance, BPO, and supply-chain/service roles and analysed using partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) through SmartPLS 4. The findings show that workplace ostracism is significantly and negatively associated with job performance, whereas employee engagement is significantly and positively associated with job performance. The model explained 24.10% of the variance in job performance. Contrary to the proposed moderation hypothesis, employee engagement did not significantly buffer the negative association between workplace ostracism and job performance. This suggests that engagement may enhance performance directly but may not operate as a sufficient protective condition against the adverse performance-related consequences of workplace exclusion. The study contributes to organizational behavior literature by clarifying the limits of employee engagement as a buffering resource and highlighting the need for organizations to directly address exclusionary workplace practices.

Indexed as

Work EngagementWork PerformanceWorkplaceAdultFemaleHumansJob SatisfactionMaleMiddle AgedWorking ConditionsEmployee EngagementIndian Service SectorJob PerformancePLS-SEMSelf-Regulation TheoryWorkplace Ostracism

Identifiers

PMID42675198
PMCPMC13530197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.