ArticleScientific reports2026
Workplace ostracism and job performance: revisiting the limits of employee engagement in addressing workplace exclusion.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Workplace ostracism represents a subtle but damaging form of workplace exclusion that can weaken employees' psychological functioning and job-related outcomes. Drawing on self-regulation theory (SRT), this study examines the association between workplace ostracism and employee job performance and investigates whether employee engagement moderates this relationship. Data were collected from 477 employees working in IT, banking and insurance, BPO, and supply-chain/service roles and analysed using partial least square structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) through SmartPLS 4. The findings show that workplace ostracism is significantly and negatively associated with job performance, whereas employee engagement is significantly and positively associated with job performance. The model explained 24.10% of the variance in job performance. Contrary to the proposed moderation hypothesis, employee engagement did not significantly buffer the negative association between workplace ostracism and job performance. This suggests that engagement may enhance performance directly but may not operate as a sufficient protective condition against the adverse performance-related consequences of workplace exclusion. The study contributes to organizational behavior literature by clarifying the limits of employee engagement as a buffering resource and highlighting the need for organizations to directly address exclusionary workplace practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.