ArticleScientific reports2026
A feature-centric predictive and sensitivity analysis framework for bio-oil yield assessment in biomass pyrolysis.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurately predicting bio-oil yield from biomass pyrolysis is a real challenge due to nonlinear interactions between feedstock physicochemical properties and operating conditions. In addition, high feature dimensionality, uncertainties in experimental measurements, and multicollinearity make prediction accuracy and interpretability even more difficult, which explains the demand for a feature-driven and explainable modeling framework. We developed an advanced regression feature-based machine learning framework trained on a very comprehensive dataset of both biomass characteristics and pyrolysis conditions. Correlation-based feature screening was performed to identify informative variables and examine potential redundancy among input parameters before predictive modeling. The model's performance in the training, validation, and testing phases was assessed using a variety of statistical metrics. To keep the model understandable, global sensitivity analysis and feature attribution methods were used to determine the relative impacts of each input and their combined effects on yield variation. The suggested system design attained very accurate predictions, demonstrating a test-stage coefficient of determination over 0.91 and consistently low prediction errors. Sensitivity analysis identified working temperature and volatile content as the key substrates for yield, followed by fixed carbon and ash content, while elemental hydrogen and oxygen showed condition-dependent behavior. The agreement in feature scoring between sensitivity methods demonstrates the reliability of the concept-based interpretation. The primary novelty of the paper is incorporating feature selection, predictive modeling, and sensitivity analysis into one feature-oriented yield prediction framework. Unlike purely accuracy-driven studies, this approach simultaneously enhances predictive performance and interpretability, providing quantitative insight into feature importance and system sensitivity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.