ArticleBone marrow transplantation2026
Pregnancy outcomes in women conceiving after hematopoietic stem cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy for childhood or adolescent acute leukemia.
Article in Bone marrow transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
21 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myeloablative conditioning before hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) during childhood or adolescence reduces adult uterine volume, but its impact on future pregnancies remains uncertain. This multicenter study, nested within the LEA cohort, compared 86 pregnancies after HSCT (55 following total-body irradiation [TBI], 31 after high-dose alkylating agents) with 180 pregnancies after conventional chemotherapy in matched leukemia survivors (total: 266 pregnancies, 117 women). Twenty-nine percent of post-HSCT pregnancies required oocyte donation; 70% occurred spontaneously. Notably, 8% (n = 7) of HSCT pregnancies were unintended and ended in induced abortion. TBI markedly worsens obstetric outcomes. Live-birth rate was 35% after TBI vs. 61% after alkylating conditioning (p = 0.02). Compared with alkylating agents, TBI conferred higher risks of late pregnancy loss (24% vs. 3%), preterm birth (50% vs. 5%), low birth weight infants (33% vs. 0%), and postpartum hemorrhage (37% vs. 5%). By contrast, pregnancies after alkylating conditioning resembled those after conventional chemotherapy (live-birth 70% vs. 82%, p = 0.2) with no excess maternal or perinatal morbidity. Thus, TBI-based myeloablation during childhood or adolescence substantially compromises subsequent pregnancy outcomes, whereas high-dose alkylating conditioning appears obstetrically safe. These data may inform reproductive counseling and obstetric surveillance in female leukemia survivors treated with HSCT during childhood and adolescence.
Identifiers
42675121What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.