ReviewComprehensive reviews in food science and food safety2026
Ethylene Oxide and 2-Chloroethanol in Foods: Hazards, Detection Markers, and Regulatory Perspectives.
Review in Comprehensive reviews in food science and food safety, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ethylene oxide (EO) has re-emerged as a major food safety concern, with findings in spices, sesame, dried vegetables, food additives, and composite foods revealing persistent gaps between toxicological hazard, analytical detectability, and regulatory interpretation. In current food control practice, 2-chloroethanol (2-CE) is often the dominant analyte because parent EO is highly volatile and reactive; however, the scientific basis for treating 2-CE as a surrogate for EO remains contested. This review examines EO-related residues through three integrated lenses: the chemistry and toxicological significance of EO and its reaction products, the analytical determination and interpretation of residues across food matrices, and the international regulatory divergence that hinders harmonization. Evidence indicates that EO itself is a compound of clear toxicological concern, whereas 2-CE is better understood as a policy-relevant marker of EO-related chemistry whose meaning depends on matrix context, processing history, and regulatory purpose. Processed and composite foods intensify this challenge by weakening the link between analytical findings and source attribution. Overall, EO is not simply a residue monitoring issue but an interpretive problem created by the misalignment of hazard assessment, marker-based analytics, and regulatory decision-making. Progress will require clearer toxicological positioning of 2-CE, matrix-specific analytical reporting, structured source attribution frameworks, and closer alignment between national control systems and international standard-setting efforts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.