ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2026
Reporting Clinically Actionable Imaging Features of Intracerebral Hemorrhage: A Survey of Neuroradiologist Practice.
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
background and purposeRecent advances in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) management increasingly expand the role of neuroimaging beyond diagnosis to potentially guide time-sensitive therapies and targeted clinical trial enrollment. We surveyed neuroradiologists to characterize current ICH imaging and reporting practices and identify opportunities for quality improvement. MATERIALS AND
methodsAn anonymous 52-item electronic survey was distributed through the American Journal of Neuroradiology Survey Corner and REDCap between April and May 2026. Survey domains included imaging acquisition, reporting practices, hematoma volume quantification, assessment of hematoma expansion predictors, ICH localization, etiologic assessment, and follow-up imaging. Responses were summarized using descriptive statistics.
resultsA total of 267 neuroradiologists completed the survey. Nearly all respondents (97.3%) reported 24/7 emergency head CT interpretation coverage. However, 41.5% did not routinely quantify hematoma volume, only 45% reported routine CTA acquisition for patients with ICH, and 30% rarely or only occasionally recommended CTA when it was not performed. While 91.3% routinely reported a positive CTA spot-sign, only 43.0% almost always assessed non-contrast CT predictors of hematoma expansion. Confidence in hemorrhage localization when crossing anatomical boundaries and etiologic classification was modest, and 45.8% routinely used the Boston Criteria version 2.0 for MRI-based assessment of cerebral amyloid angiopathy.
conclusionsContemporary neuroradiology practice demonstrates several readily addressable gaps in ICH imaging and reporting, including hematoma volume quantification, routine vascular imaging, standardized assessment of hematoma expansion imaging markers, and etiologic assessment. Standardizing these practices can improved image guided risk-stratification and facilitate implementation of emerging time-sensitive ICH therapies.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.