ArticleArquivos de neuro-psiquiatria2026
Acoustic voice analysis of women with migraine.
Article in Arquivos de neuro-psiquiatria, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Migraine and voice are related because of the shared pathophysiological mechanisms involving the vagus nerve, which also innervates the larynx. Objective: To conduct acoustic voice analysis and evaluate voice-related quality of life in women with migraine, in comparison with a control group. Methods: In the current cross-sectional study, we performed voice recordings and used the Voice-Related Quality of Life and migraine characteristics questionnaires. The variables included loudness, fundamental frequency, jitter, shimmer, glottal-to-noise excitation ratio, and phonatory deviation diagram. Results: The sample comprised 193 women (55 in the control group and 138 in the migraine group). No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups regarding the acoustic variables studied. The migraine group reported poorer scores in the physical domain of the Voice-Related Quality of Life questionnaire ( Conclusion: In the studied sample, no differences were observed between women with migraine and the control group regarding the parameters of acoustic voice analysis. Women with migraine presented poorer voice-related quality of life compared to the control group.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.