ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026
GFN1-xTB-Assisted Machine Learning for Electronic Structure Screening of Metal-Organic Frameworks.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) are versatile materials with tunable crystal structures, morphologies, and chemistries, offering diverse physical and chemical properties. Although typically electrically insulating, specific combinations of organic and inorganic components can impart electrical conductivity to MOFs. The virtually limitless chemical space of MOFs, however, presents a significant challenge in identifying optimal candidates for various applications. Although density functional theory (DFT) can probe their electronic structure, its high computational cost hinders the discovery of novel electroactive MOFs using machine learning due to limited data. To tackle these challenges, a semiempirical extended tight-binding approach (GFN1-xTB) is employed to compute the electronic properties of a dataset of MOFs, and it is shown that GFN1-xTB approximates MOF band gaps well, as compared to semilocal DFT. These data are used to train an interpretable Δ-learning model that predicts the difference between low- and high-fidelity band gaps, given by xTB and DFT data at the hybrid level, respectively. This model outperforms direct models trained using only the DFT values. The Δ-learning model also outperforms models with deep-learning architecture, fine-tuned on our custom dataset to predict the band gaps of MOFs. With limited high-quality DFT band gaps, taking advantage of Δ-learning using low-cost GFN1-xTB leads to better predictions than relying on DFT data alone.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.