ArticleJournal of chemical theory and computation2026
Evaluating Mechanical-Embedding ML/MM for Predicting Mutation Effects in Chorismate Mutase Catalysis.
Article in Journal of chemical theory and computation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Predicting how mutations alter enzyme catalysis remains a central challenge in enzymology and enzyme engineering. Although quantum mechanics/molecular mechanics (QM/MM) simulations can in principle compute the activation free energy associated with enzymatic reactions, their high computational cost limits systematic studies across many variants. Here, we benchmark a mechanical-embedding machine learning potential/molecular mechanics (ML/MM) protocol for predicting mutation effects on chorismate mutase catalysis, a model system extensively studied both experimentally and computationally. In this framework, the QM-region potential energy surface is represented by an actively learned machine learning potential, while QM/MM electrostatic interactions are treated classically using partial charges predicted from instantaneous geometries for the QM region. Combined with umbrella sampling, the ML/MM approach enables efficient estimation of activation free energies and direct comparison with experimental kinetics. The method shows reasonable correlations with experiment across both nonpolar and polar active-site mutations and is quantitatively accurate for nonpolar mutations despite their narrow energetic range (<1 kcal mol-1). However, it substantially underestimates the activation free energy for polar mutations. The results highlight both the promise and limitations of mechanical-embedding ML/MM approaches for predicting mutation effects on enzyme catalysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.