ArticleAppetite2026
The NU-HOME RCT home food environment, family meal frequency, meal quality and children's dietary intake and physical activity outcomes.
Article in Appetite, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionThe assessment of secondary outcomes in childhood obesity RCTs is important to understand programmatic impacts and precursors to weight-related changes. STUDY
designRCT. Baseline and post-intervention (9 months, 86% retention) data were collected (2017-2019) and analyzed (2022) for 114 7-10-year-old participants in the New Ulm at HOME (NU-HOME) study, which aimed to prevent obesity in rural children. The NU-HOME intervention engaged whole families in 7 monthly in-person, interactive sessions promoting healthful home food environments (i.e., frequent family meals, home availability of fruits and vegetables (FV), high quality of foods served at meals), children's dietary intake (i.e., diet quality via HEI and FV and low SSB intake), and children's physical activity (PA; i.e., moderate-to-vigorous PA (MVPA) and reduced screen time).
main outcome measuresFamily home food environment; child dietary intake and PA outcomes.
resultsCompared to families in the wait-list control group, families in the intervention group showed significantly greater improvement in the availability of vegetables in the home (p < .05) and the quality of foods and beverages served at the evening meal (p < .05). Although not statistically significant (p = .07), children in the intervention group demonstrated a 1/3 cup increase in fruit consumption compared to children in the control group, a clinically meaningful outcome. No significant treatment group differences were seen for family meal frequency, home availability of fruit, intake of vegetables, SSB intake, or minutes of MVPA and screen time.
conclusionsOur findings of significant beneficial changes in the home availability of vegetables and the quality of food and beverages served at meals demonstrate the positive, albeit limited, impact of the NU-HOME program on the home food environment for rural children.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.