ArticleEBioMedicine2026
Plasma neurofilament light for early differentiation of multiple system atrophy from Parkinson disease.
Article in EBioMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly differentiation of multiple system atrophy (MSA) from Parkinson's disease (PD) remains difficult, particularly within two years of symptom onset, when diagnostic uncertainty has major implications for prognosis, referral, and trial enrolment. Because MSA is rare, previous biomarker studies have often been limited by relatively small samples and restricted multicentre validation. We aimed to determine the diagnostic performance of plasma neurofilament light chain (NfL) for differentiating MSA from PD and to assess the incremental value of glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), total tau (t-tau), and phosphorylated tau at threonine 217 (p-tau217).
methodsIn this multicentre cross-sectional diagnostic study, participants were enrolled from five movement-disorder referral centres in China between Jan 1, 2018, and June 30, 2024, and were divided by enrolment period into discovery and temporally separated validation datasets. Plasma NfL, GFAP, t-tau, and p-tau217 were measured using light-initiated chemiluminescence assays. Group comparisons used age- and sex-adjusted models, and discrimination was assessed using receiver-operating-characteristic analysis with sensitivity, specificity, predictive values, and robustness analyses.
findingsThe analysis included 2408 participants: 782 (32.5%) with PD, 796 (33.1%) with MSA, and 830 (34.5%) healthy controls. NfL was the best single biomarker for differentiating MSA from PD in the discovery dataset (AUC 0.920, 95% CI 0.903-0.936). The discovery-derived cutoff of 41.3 pg/mL yielded sensitivity of 90.5% and specificity of 83.4% in the discovery dataset, and sensitivity of 86.7% and specificity of 85.5% in the validation dataset (AUC 0.924, 95% CI 0.898-0.948). In the early-stage subgroup, NfL retained strong performance (AUC 0.943, 95% CI 0.915-0.966). Integrated multimarker models provided limited incremental discrimination over NfL alone.
interpretationPlasma NfL may support the differentiation between clinically diagnosed MSA and PD, including early in the disease course. The limited added value of multimarker panels supports a simpler and more immediately translatable NfL-first strategy for diagnostically uncertain parkinsonism.
fundingNational Natural Science Foundation of China; the Capital's Fund for Health Improvement and Research; Beijing Natural Science Foundation; Beijing Municipal Science and Technology Commission; Beijing Neurosurgical Institute; Beijing Traditional Chinese Medicine Science and Technology Development Fund.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.