Trial reportEBioMedicine2026
Quantifying how HIV-1 envelope sequence features impact vaccine efficacy in the HVTN 705/HPX2008 randomised trial in southern African women.
Trial report in EBioMedicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
36 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundA heterologous Ad26.Mos4.HIV and clade C gp140 vaccine regimen did not show overall significant efficacy against HIV-1 acquisition [point estimate 14.1%; 95% confidence interval (CI), -22.0 to 39.5] in the HVTN 705/HPX2008 trial in southern African women. We examined whether and how vaccine efficacy (VE) against HIV-1 diagnosis over 7-24 months post-first dose varied by HIV-1 Envelope (Env) amino acid sequence features.
methodsHIV-1 viral sequences were generated by PacBio SMRT-UMI sequencing from the first RNA-positive sample of participants who acquired HIV-1. Env amino acid sequence features were prespecified for analyses based on 1) being hypothesised to impact VE; and 2) having sufficient variability. Sieve analyses assessed VE by a single representative sequence and by viral population composition.
findingsThe majority of Env features showed no evidence of differential VE, with only two signals having familywise error rate (FWER) P-values <0.10. In single-sequence analyses, VE declined with increasing physicochemical-weighted Hamming distance from the C97ZA vaccine insert in clade C broadly neutralising antibody resistance-associated signature positions (FWER P = 0.08). Sequence-predicted Env structural features showed no significant vaccine vs. placebo differences in structural divergence from the C97ZA vaccine-insert Env sequence. In multi-sequence analyses (median 121 sequences/individual), VE was higher against viral populations with ≥99% vs. <99% L832 prevalence (VE = 91.7%; 95% CI, 67.4-97.9 vs. VE = -7.0%; 95% CI, -55.5 to 26.4) (unadjusted P = 0.0002 for differential VE, FWER P = 0.023).
interpretationDespite extensive prespecified and exploratory analyses including Env features supported by prior studies to potentially impact VE, there was only limited, weak evidence that Env sequence features modified VE in HVTN 705. Although previous work suggested a protective role of IgG3 binding to V1V2 in a small subgroup of vaccine recipients, a V1V2 sieve signal was absent.
fundingNational Institutes of Health and Johnson & Johnson.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.