ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2026
Impact of AI-Triaged Worklists and AI-Assisted Report Generation on Radiology Turnaround Times: Prospective Real-World Study.
Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundRadiology departments frequently manage large, heterogeneous worklists using first-in, first-out (FIFO) reporting workflows. This approach does not account for clinical urgency and may contribute to prolonged reporting delays, particularly in high-volume settings. AI systems are increasingly being integrated into radiology workflows, not only for image analysis but also as tools for worklist prioritization and report generation. However, real-world evidence of their operational impact remains limited.
objectiveThis study aimed to evaluate the impact of an AI-triaged reading worklist combined with AI-assisted report generation on radiologist workflow efficiency, measured by report generation time (RGT) and overall turnaround time (TAT) for chest radiographs in a real-world hospital setting.
methodsWe conducted a single-center prospective paired study using a single-sequence crossover design. Eight board-certified radiologists interpreted chest radiographs during 2 reporting sessions: an unaided session using standard FIFO worklists and an AI-assisted session using an AI-triaged worklist with integrated report generation tools, separated by a 4-week washout period. Chest radiographs acquired between November 2023 and January 2024 were included. RGT was defined as the time from opening a study to report finalization, and TAT was defined as the time from the start of a reporting session to report finalization. Statistical comparisons were performed using nonparametric tests.
resultsA total of 1054 chest radiographs were included. Median RGT decreased from 2 (IQR 1-4) minutes in the unaided session to 0.53 (IQR 0.22-1.12) minutes in the AI-assisted session (P<.001), representing a 73.3% reduction. The largest reduction was observed in radiographs categorized as normal, with median RGT decreasing from 2 (IQR 1-3) minutes to 0.2 (IQR 0.13-0.35) minutes (a 90% reduction). Mean TAT decreased from 876.21 (SD 1014.20; 95% CI 816.06-940.55) minutes to 82.25 (SD 83.38; 95% CI 76.98-87.27) minutes with AI assistance, corresponding to a 90.6% reduction. Significant reductions in TAT were observed across all urgency categories, including critical studies (all P<.001).
conclusionsIn a real-world clinical setting, the use of AI-triaged worklists and AI-assisted report generation was associated with substantial reductions in RGT and overall TAT for chest radiographs. These findings suggest that AI, when deployed as workflow infrastructure rather than a diagnostic replacement, may meaningfully improve radiology operational efficiency and reporting timeliness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.