ArticleCBE life sciences education2026
Metacognitive Milestones: A Longitudinal View of How Life Science Students Develop Metacognition Across Their College Years.
Article in CBE life sciences education, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Metacognition can support undergraduates in challenging science courses by helping them to monitor their understanding of concepts, evaluate their approaches for learning, and change their plans for studying as needed. Fostering metacognitive development can help students succeed in science, yet there is limited understanding of how students develop metacognition in college. We conducted one of the first longitudinal studies to investigate how, when, and why life science students use metacognition throughout their undergraduate career. We used yearly semi-structured interviews to capture students' use of metacognition across four years of college. By conducting longitudinal qualitative data analysis, we outline a framework of metacognitive change that details the stages that are evident for each metacognitive skill. We synthesize our findings into milestones students reach as their metacognition develops. For example, students initially use planning and evaluating separately and reach a milestone when they first connect these skills by using their evaluations to inform their study plans. Later, some, but not all, students reach the milestone of integrating all three skills by connecting monitoring to their planning and evaluating. We use our results to build theory on metacognitive development, and we offer suggestions for instructors who aim to foster their students' metacognition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.