ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026
Temporally structured motor and auditory representations in covert syllable production.
Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Inner speaking-the deliberate generation of speech through covert production mechanisms-is a common human experience. Current accounts propose that it engages sensorimotor processes similar to those underlying overt speech. Here, we asked whether motor and auditory representations during inner speaking maintain the granularity and temporal structure observed in overt speech. Using magnetoencephalography and time-resolved decoding, we examined neural dynamics across two experiments. Participants covertly produced consonant-vowel syllables designed to emphasize either articulatory or acoustic phonetic components through contrasts in the consonants or vowels, respectively. Across experiments, neural activity closely paralleled stages for overt speech. Consonants (articulatory contrasts) were more strongly decoded from speech motor cortex before the expected syllable onset, whereas vowels (acoustic contrasts) were more strongly decoded from auditory cortex immediately afterward, consistent with the onset of internally generated percepts. Vowel discriminability in auditory regions was further graded according to separation along a perceptually relevant acoustic dimension in formant space approximated by the F2-F1 projection, indicating specificity in auditory representations. These findings reveal temporally structured, phoneme-level content-specific sensorimotor representations during inner speaking, consistent with production-based accounts involving internal forward models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.