Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42673462›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2026

Recent high-severity wildfires in a dry-conifer landscape are unprecedented over five centuries and foretell future forest loss.

Andreas P Wion, Jens T Stevens, Jonathan D Coop, Calvin A Farris, Sean A Parks, Craig D Allen, Ellis Q Margolis

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Recent high-severity wildfires in a dry-conifer landscape are unprecedented over five centuries and foretell future forest loss.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Andreas P WionU.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, New Mexico Landscapes Field Station, Santa Fe, NM 87508.ORCID 0000-0002-0701-2843
Jens T StevensSchool of Environmental and Forest Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195.ORCID 0000-0002-2234-1960
Jonathan D CoopClark School of Environment and Sustainability, Western Colorado University, Gunnison, CO 81231.ORCID 0000-0002-3930-340X
Calvin A FarrisNational Park Service, Division of Fire and Aviation Management, Pacific Southwest Region, Klamath Falls, OR 97601.ORCID 0000-0001-9748-4432
Sean A ParksAriel Re UK Limited, London EC3R 8AF, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-2982-5255
Craig D AllenDepartment of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, NM 87106.ORCID 0000-0002-8777-5989
Ellis Q MargolisU.S. Geological Survey, Fort Collins Science Center, New Mexico Landscapes Field Station, Santa Fe, NM 87508.ORCID 0000-0002-0595-9005

Funding

DOI | U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) Ecosystems Mission Area - Land Change ScienceUSDA | FS | Rocky Mountain Research Station (RMRS) NA
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dry forests of the western United States evolved with frequent, spatially extensive, low-severity fires, followed by a century of fire exclusion. Recently, these same forests have experienced large and increasingly severe fires causing widespread forest loss. To what extent do modern high-severity fires depart from pre-1900 fire regimes, and how do these departures affect the future persistence of dry-conifer forests? We address these questions using a multiscalar approach that combines the largest landscape-scale tree-ring fire-scar network in North America with neutral landscape model simulations in the Jemez Mountains of northern New Mexico. Fire scars recorded a continuous 400-y history (ca. 1500-1900 CE) of frequent, low-severity fires across individual sites, landscapes, and centuries. We evaluated whether forests exhibiting this record could plausibly persist if they had historically burned under modern patterns of high-severity fire. Across the 240,000-ha Jemez landscape, high-severity fires from 1995-2024 burned 32% of fire-scar sites and 25% of dry-conifer forests. Within the Las Conchas Fire perimeter-a 61,000 ha area reburned by multiple fires-66% of fire-scar sites and 71% of forests were burned at high severity, erasing multiple centuries of forest and fire history. Simulations indicate that the probability of the observed fire-scar network persisting under modern high-severity fire rates is near-zero (

Indexed as

Conservation of Natural ResourcesFiresForestsTracheophytaWildfiresHistory, 15th CenturyHistory, 16th CenturyHistory, 17th CenturyHistory, 19th CenturyHistory, 20th CenturyHistory, 21st CenturyNew MexicoTreesfire regime changefire severityJemez Mountainsneutral landscape modeltree-ring fire-scar

Identifiers

PMID42673462
PMCPMC13552868

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.