Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42672117›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2026

Visual motion does not bias gravity-referenced vestibular coding in the primate cerebellar nodulus and uvula.

Lex J Gómez, Robyn L Mildren, Faisal Karmali, Kathleen E Cullen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lex J GómezDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4643-0869
Robyn L MildrenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Faisal KarmaliDepartment of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1140-4954
Kathleen E CullenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9348-0933

Funding

The Physiology of Vestibular CompensationR01DC002390 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Kathleen E Cullen · 1995 to 2026
$10.7M
Neural Computations Underlying Cancellation of the Vestibular Consequences of Voluntary MovementR01DC018061 · NIDCD · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Kathleen E Cullen · 2019 to 2026
$4.0M
Contribution of vestibular dysfunction and its central multisensory integration to imbalance in agingR01AG075532 · NIA · MASSACHUSETTS EYE AND EAR INFIRMARY · PI Faisal Karmali · 2024 to 2026
$1.8M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG075532NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC002390NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC018061
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual motion is known to influence perceptions of tilt, verticality, and translation, suggesting that optic flow is combined with vestibular cues to estimate orientation relative to gravity. The cerebellar nodulus and ventral uvula (NU) are a prime candidate to perform this computation because this region uniquely receives convergent semicircular canal, otolith, and proprioceptive inputs, and in non-primate species full-field visual motion robustly modulates NU activity. Here, we tested whether visual roll motion, known to bias perceived orientation relative to gravity, alters the internal gravity-referenced transformation used by NU neurons to encode vestibular self-motion. To test this, we recorded single-unit activity from NU Purkinje cells in rhesus macaques during whole-body translations in darkness, either without visual stimulation or after prolonged full-field optokinetic roll motion. We hypothesized that visual motion simulating head tilt would bias the NU's internal gravity estimate, leading to altered translation-evoked responses. Contrary to this prediction, visual motion had no effect on either baseline firing rates or vestibular responses. Moreover, a computational model predicting visually induced shifts in neural tuning was not supported by the data. These results show that visual roll motion, although known to influence perceived orientation, does not bias gravity-referenced vestibular coding in the primate NU. This specialization may preserve a fast, body-anchored gravity estimate for postural and reflexive motor control, delegating visual-vestibular integration for perception to downstream circuits.

Indexed as

CerebellumMotion PerceptionVestibule, LabyrinthAnimalsGravitationMacaca mulattaMaleOrientationPhotic StimulationPurkinje Cells

Identifiers

PMID42672117
PMCPMC13577572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.