ArticlePLoS biology2026
Visual motion does not bias gravity-referenced vestibular coding in the primate cerebellar nodulus and uvula.
Article in PLoS biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Visual motion is known to influence perceptions of tilt, verticality, and translation, suggesting that optic flow is combined with vestibular cues to estimate orientation relative to gravity. The cerebellar nodulus and ventral uvula (NU) are a prime candidate to perform this computation because this region uniquely receives convergent semicircular canal, otolith, and proprioceptive inputs, and in non-primate species full-field visual motion robustly modulates NU activity. Here, we tested whether visual roll motion, known to bias perceived orientation relative to gravity, alters the internal gravity-referenced transformation used by NU neurons to encode vestibular self-motion. To test this, we recorded single-unit activity from NU Purkinje cells in rhesus macaques during whole-body translations in darkness, either without visual stimulation or after prolonged full-field optokinetic roll motion. We hypothesized that visual motion simulating head tilt would bias the NU's internal gravity estimate, leading to altered translation-evoked responses. Contrary to this prediction, visual motion had no effect on either baseline firing rates or vestibular responses. Moreover, a computational model predicting visually induced shifts in neural tuning was not supported by the data. These results show that visual roll motion, although known to influence perceived orientation, does not bias gravity-referenced vestibular coding in the primate NU. This specialization may preserve a fast, body-anchored gravity estimate for postural and reflexive motor control, delegating visual-vestibular integration for perception to downstream circuits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.