ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Family planning self-care: From global frameworks to local meaning, perceptions, experiences and opportunities in Niger.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Family planning (FP) self-care is a strategic pillar for advancing Universal Health Coverage (UHC) and mitigating health workforce shortages. However, a significant disconnect persists between global normative frameworks and local implementation realities. This study examines the local meanings, perceptions, and experiences of FP self-care in Niger to inform contextualized scale-up of self-care interventions. We employed a sequential mixed-methods design in the Niamey (urban) and Zinder (rural) regions of Niger. A quantitative household survey was conducted with 510 women and 357 men to assess fertility awareness, method preferences, and information-seeking behaviors. This was complemented by qualitative in-depth interviews with 36 women, 18 men, 12 healthcare providers, and 15 community leaders. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while qualitative transcripts underwent iterative thematic analysis mapped to global self-care frameworks. "Self-care" was locally reconstructed not as autonomy. While defined by all participants as hygiene, it was uniquely reconstructed by men and community leaders as economic provision. A distinct "medicalization paradox" emerged: women defined self-care as the agency to seek clinical dependence, prioritizing facility-based providers over community sources (e.g., 58.1% vs. 12.1% for oral contraceptives) to mitigate fears regarding product quality and side effects. Conversely, men favored Community Health Workers (34.3%) driven by logistical efficiency and economic motivations. Physiological knowledge was low; only 11.8% of women correctly identified the fertile window, with misconceptions reinforced by fatalistic narratives propagated by community gatekeepers. Furthermore, providers expressed strong skepticism regarding user competence, fearing "chaos" without medical supervision. Implementing FP self-care in Niger requires shifting from a "product-first" to a "values-first" approach. Strategies must be gender-stratified: leveraging "medicalized validation" to address women's safety concerns while utilizing community-based channels to meet men's efficiency needs. Ultimately, self-care should be framed not as independence from the health system, but as an empowered partnership with it.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.