ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Evaluating the acceptability, feasibility, and implementation fidelity of a multipurpose mobile health (mHealth) app used for Tuberculosis (TB) contact tracing by Ward-Based Outreach Teams (WBOTs) in South Africa.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mobile health (mHealth) technologies are increasingly used to support community-based healthcare. However, their real-world impact often remains unclear. Understanding implementation factors is essential for advancing their use and achieving meaningful health outcomes. We evaluated an mHealth tool (AitaHealth) after customising its modules and workflows for household Tuberculosis (TB) contact tracing and other community-based data collection by community health workers (CHWs). We describe the acceptability, feasibility, and implementation fidelity of this approach. We conducted a mixed-methods evaluation in two South African districts: uMkhanyakude and Ekurhuleni. We collected qualitative data through focus group discussions (FGDs) and in-depth interviews (IDIs) with CHWs, team leaders, and key stakeholders. We used deductive thematic analysis grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to assess the acceptability and implementation feasibility of the mHealth tool. We used quantitative data from the AitaHealth metadata to assess implementation fidelity. CHWs appreciated AitaHealth's efficiency, data security, and credibility. Across the two districts, 103 CHWs recorded data for 2,452 households and 10,649 household members. However, they reported challenges in ease of use, with unreliable devices, weak support, and safety concerns hindering data collection. These issues led to inconsistent engagement, with 48.5% of CHWs logging in fewer than 15 times during implementation. Despite these challenges, when used, AitaHealth ensured high-quality data collection and household coverage, with TB-related fields completed in over 94% of households, demonstrating its potential under better conditions. AitaHealth`s limitations stemmed from system constraints rather than user resistance. To achieve full impact, mHealth tools require reliable infrastructure and supportive environments for both the tools and their implementers.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.