ArticlePloS one2026
Socio-economic and financial characteristics of companion animal clinics in Ankara Province, Türkiye: A cluster-based classification.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Companion animal clinics are an integral part of urban veterinary practice. Yet such clinics face several challenges, including rising operational costs, intense market competition, and shifting pet owners' expectations. In contrast to previous studies focused on veterinary business models, little in-depth examination of determinants of clinic performance has been conducted to date. To address this gap, the current study evaluated the socio-economic and financial characteristics of companion animal clinics in Ankara Province, Türkiye, using Principal Component Analysis followed by k-means clustering. A cross-sectional survey was conducted among the owners or managers of 35 companion animal clinics using a questionnaire comprising 44 indicators. Cluster 1 (10 clinics, 28.57%), which included multi-service clinics, had the highest costs ($8616.77) and income ($10671.77) due to service diversity and high investments in staff and equipment. Cluster 2 (8 clinics, 22.86%) included clinics characterized by moderate costs and stable income, oriented toward efficiency and targeted services. Cluster 3 (8 clinics, 22.86%) included cost-efficient clinics that mainly provided cat care and achieved the highest profitability of $5093.65. Cluster 4 (9 clinics, 25.71%) included clinics specializing in the care of exotic animals, with the lowest monthly income of $5023.83 and difficulties in achieving regular profitability. The results of our study revealed that the differences between clinic profiles are generally related to operating cost structures and strategies, income sources, and the variety of services provided to clients. Clinics that manage operational costs in line with income streams and adapt to client needs tend to perform better financially. In conclusion, veterinary professionals can use these insights to improve their strategies, optimize resource use, and improve financial performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.