ArticlePLOS digital health2026
The SARS-CoV-2 Integrated Genomic Epidemiology Database (IGED): Linking viral genomes with patient-level metadata to advance statewide genomic surveillance in California.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
28 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In July 2021, the California Code of Regulations Title 17 required all laboratories performing SARS‑CoV‑2 whole genome sequencing (WGS) to report their sequencing results to the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). These viral genomic data and patient metadata were compiled into the Integrated Genomic Epidemiology Database (IGED). Linking anonymized viral sequences with patient‑level information enabled monitoring of infectiousness, pathogenicity, transmission dynamics, evolution, and vaccine evasion among emerging SARS‑CoV‑2 lineages. Laboratories performing SARS-CoV-2 WGS transmitted sequencing results to CDPH through Electronic Laboratory Reporting (ELR) and non-ELR pathways. CDPH applied uniform reporting requirements but allowed flexibility in specific data formats to accommodate diverse data systems. To preserve data quality and interoperability across heterogeneous sources, CDPH implemented standardization, validation, and deduplication protocols. Snowflake, a cloud‑based data storage and analytics platform, and Posit Connect, a cloud deployment and automation platform, supported the management, processing, and integration of data within the IGED. The IGED established links between SARS‑CoV‑2 WGS data and epidemiologic metadata for 801,418 sequences, representing 81.7% of all sequences reported in California. Lineages reported to the IGED showed strong concordance with lineage proportions in GISAID. Sequences reported to the IGED had average turnaround times longer than one month, and the majority of sequencing was performed in Southern California and Los Angeles. The IGED enhanced genomic surveillance through predictive modeling and monitoring concerning evolutionary trends such as recombination and saltations in persistent infections. Development of the IGED highlighted the need for standardized data requirements, sustained funding for sequencing, incentives for data submission, and interdisciplinary collaboration to build an effective genomic surveillance system. This framework for linking genomic and epidemiologic data has not only generated critical insights for SARS‑CoV‑2 but also provided the foundation for CDPH and other public health organizations to develop similar IGED‑like systems for other priority pathogens as genomic surveillance expands.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.