Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42672070›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Bump2Baby & Me+ (B2B&Me+): Protocol for a multi-country, European hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness study to reduce the incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus and improve maternal and child health.

Sharleen L O'Reilly, Thérèse McDonnell, Linda Reme Sagedal, Mercedes G Bermúdez, Florian Herrmann, Hanna Jasiak-Jóźwik, Nina Cecilie Øverby, Hilde Kristin Refvik Riise, Fionnuala McAuliffe, Helle T Maindal and 12 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07189221 (BUMP2BABY & ME+), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07189221 nanot yet recruitingnot on this map

BUMP2BABY & ME+ (B2B&ME+): A Multi-Country, European Implementation Project to Reduce Adverse Birth Outcomes, Improve Maternal and Child Health and Reduce Non-Communicable Disease Risk

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity College DublinRan2025 to 2028Enrolled3,600ConditionsGestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)ArmsLife Style Intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Sharleen L O'ReillySchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
Thérèse McDonnellSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5890-3689
Linda Reme SagedalSørlandet Hospital Trust, Kristiansand, Norway.
Mercedes G BermúdezDepartment of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Florian HerrmannFundacion para la Investigacion Biosanitaria de Andalucia Oriental, Granada, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3383-0874
Hanna Jasiak-JóźwikPomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2007-9011
Nina Cecilie ØverbyUniversity of Agder, Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1871-041X
Hilde Kristin Refvik RiiseWestern Norway University of Applied Sciences (Høgskulen på Vestlandet), Bergen, Norway.
Fionnuala McAuliffeUCD Perinatal Research Centre, University College Dublin and National Maternity Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.
Helle T MaindalDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Laura HeadleyLiva Healthcare A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Cristina CampoyDepartment of Paediatrics, School of Medicine, University of Granada, Granada, Spain.
Sebastian KwiatkowskiPomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland.
Ragnhild B StrandbergWestern Norway University of Applied Sciences (Høgskulen på Vestlandet), Bergen, Norway.
Anju RawalDepartment of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0002-7500-4009
Katie AngottiLiva Healthcare A/S, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hannah FoleySchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
Lucy MurphySchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
Lin ChenSchool of Agriculture and Food Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.
Quentin Le CornuUCD School of Public Health, Physiotherapy and Sport Science, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-9362-8734
Marjolein M IversenWestern Norway University of Applied Sciences (Høgskulen på Vestlandet), Bergen, Norway.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9954-171X
Timothy SkinnerWestern Norway University of Applied Sciences (Høgskulen på Vestlandet), Bergen, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) affects 1-in-7 pregnancies globally and is associated with significant short- and long-term health consequences. Although health behaviour change interventions can effectively reduce these risks, a significant implementation gap exists in translating this evidence into routine practice. Bump2Baby and Me (B2B&Me) was a mobile health (mHealth) coaching intervention provided to women at-risk of GDM from early pregnancy through to 1-year postpartum. B2B&Me Plus (B2B&Me+) aims to refine, implement and evaluate the implementation of this personalised intervention across 4 countries (Ireland, Spain, Poland and Norway) with differing health systems and population profiles.

methodsThis study employs a hybrid type 3 implementation-effectiveness design using a non-randomised ABA block approach within a longitudinal cohort. Participants will be screened using the Monash machine learning GDM screening tool (MMLGDST). During the intervention (Block B), women at risk of developing GDM will be offered access to a smartphone-based coaching application featuring 1:1 synchronous sessions, asynchronous text and video messaging along with a Bluetooth-enabled weighing scale for self-monitoring. Support continues from early pregnancy through to nine months postpartum. The study's primary objective is to evaluate reach, adoption, implementation and maintenance of the B2B&Me+ intervention programme when delivered within routine maternity care. Implementation success will be assessed using the RE-AIM framework, while secondary outcomes will assess intervention effectiveness. The study will examine population-level uptake at each site, evaluate the benefits and costs of implementation across varying contexts, and analyse how four different referral methods, randomised at the site level, affect uptake. In addition, a European implementation toolkit will be developed to provide health services with scalable strategies to bridge the evidence-to-practice gap. DISCUSSION: This study will contribute to a growing literature on the implementation of a successfully trialled mHealth intervention in a real-world context. Understanding variation in both intervention and implementation success within a routine maternity care context across diverse settings will inform the development of an implementation toolkit to support health services in reducing the incidence of GDM and improving maternal and child health outcomes. This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07189221) on 28 August 2025 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07189221?cond=diabetes).

Indexed as

Child HealthDiabetes, GestationalEuropeFemaleHumansIncidenceMaternal HealthPregnancyTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID42672070
PMCPMC13529020

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.