ArticleClinical transplantation2026
Real-World Use of Normothermic Machine Perfusion in Liver Transplantation: A Multi-Institutional Experience From the National Organ Perfusion Registry.
Article in Clinical transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Normothermic machine perfusion (NMP) has enabled increased utilization of high-risk liver allografts; however, real-world data describing use, perfusion logistics, and associated outcomes remain limited. We established the National Organ Perfusion Registry (NOPR), a multicenter collaborative registry designed to capture granular perfusion data not available in the national transplant datasets. Adult liver transplant recipients who underwent transplantation using NMP between 2022 and 2024 at nine U.S. centers were included. Registry data were linked to the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) Standard Transplant Analysis and Research files to obtain donor and recipient characteristics and post-transplant outcomes. Descriptive analyzes were performed to characterize the indications for NMP use, procurement practices, perfusion timing parameters, and early graft outcomes. A total of 545 NMP liver transplants were analyzed, including 282 donations after circulatory death (DCD) and 263 donations after brain death (DBD). DCD was the most common indication for NMP, and its incidence increased substantially during the study period. Perfusion practices varied, including procurement strategy, device use, time from cross-clamp to NMP initiation, and total perfusion duration. Despite this heterogeneity, early outcomes were favorable, with a 90-day death-censored graft failure rate of 1.7%, and no difference between DCD and DBD grafts. Recipients of DCD grafts had a shorter post-transplant length of stay than DBD recipients. In this multicenter, real-world cohort analysis, NMP was associated with low rates of early graft failure across diverse centers and perfusion practices. These findings support the feasibility of contemporary NMP use and underscore the importance of continued multicenter evaluation to refine perfusion strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.