Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42672013›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Integrating anatomy learning: A comparative study of anatomical digital resource and flipped model with sectra.

Aisha Abdul Haq, Sonia Ijaz Haider, Shumaila Rafi, Naheed Khan, Fareeha Butt, Dur-E-Shewar Rehman

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Aisha Abdul HaqDepartment of Anatomy, Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Sind, Pakistan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5855-9964
Sonia Ijaz HaiderDow Institute of Health Professions Education, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Sind, Pakistan.
Shumaila RafiDow Institute of Health Professions Education, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Sind, Pakistan.
Naheed KhanDepartment of Anatomy, Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Sind, Pakistan.
Fareeha ButtDepartment of Physiology, Dow Medical College, Dow university of Health Sciences, Karachi, Sind, Pakistan.
Dur-E-Shewar RehmanBasic Sciences Department, College of Science and Health Professions, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundInnovative modalities have been administered in educating Anatomy to medical undergraduates, specifically Neuroscience because of its clinical significance. For building strong foundation in Anatomy, focus is shifting towards adaptation of digital resources for delivery of content such as three-dimensional (3D) digital resources like 3 D Sectra Visualization Table (SVT). However, lack of dimensional details and relationship of displayed Neuroanatomy images and limited applicability of its digital dissection features necessitate an adjunct teaching strategy to complement the deficiencies in Sectra visualization table. Therefore, to bring about meaningful learning in Neuroanatomy, a model of flipped classroom was designed with existing three-dimensional digital Anatomy resource (3D SVT) and observed the comparison between two approaches on students' academic performance.

objectivesThe study was designed to accomplish the following two objectives: To compare the effect of flipped classroom teaching strategy combined with a 3 D digital Anatomy resource (SVT) and 3D digital Anatomical resource (SVT) alone on students academic performance in Neuroanatomy through pre and post-test scores To assess medical students' perceptions of the flipped classroom model integrated with digital anatomy resources in the context of learning Neuroanatomy.

methodsA Quasi- experimental study was conducted on two thirty-three medical students. Second year MBBS students were randomly divided into two groups. Group I (Experimental group) was exposed to the flipped classroom with digital anatomical resource while Group II (Control group) was taught through the 3D Sectra session. A pre and the posttest was held before and after each session. A five-point Likert scale questionnaire was administered to evaluate students' perception of the flipped classroom integrated model with Sectra (3 D digital resource). In the present study pre and post test scores of students for two groups were reported, within group comparison was made using Wilcoxon sign rank test and between group comparison was done using Mann Whitney U test. Comparison of test scores was also done with respect to gender.

resultsThe results of the study revealed that after exposure to flipped classroom with 3D digital resource, a significant increase in the posttest score of interventional Group was observed in comparison to control Group post test score after receiving session with 3D resource alone (p < 0.001). However, with regards to gender, both male and female students give an average similar performance giving no significant difference in their performance. The reliability coefficient for perceptions of experimental group students after exposure to flipped model showed the overall Cronbach's alpha of 0.94.

conclusionThe study showed the flipped classroom with 3D digital resource approach significantly improved students' test scores compared to the sessions with 3D resource alone. Moreover, a general positive perception of the new teaching approach was reported by students of flipped classroom.

Indexed as

AnatomyEducation, Medical, UndergraduateLearningNeuroanatomyComputer-Assisted InstructionEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMaleModels, AnatomicStudents, Medical

Identifiers

PMID42672013
PMCPMC13529019

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.