ArticleClinical transplantation2026
Feasibility and Acceptability of a Group-Based Relapse Prevention Program for Liver Transplant Recipients With Alcohol-Associated Liver.
Article in Clinical transplantation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Alcohol-associated liver disease (ALD) has become the leading indication for liver transplantation (LT) in the United States. Contemporary practice has shifted toward broader LT access for medically urgent patients with limited pretransplant abstinence or alcohol use disorder (AUD) treatment experience. These patients require AUD treatment post-LT; however, standardized treatment protocols in this setting remain limited. In response to this need, our center implemented a virtual monthly group-based relapse prevention program (RPP) for liver transplant recipients (LTRs) transplanted for ALD. The aim of this quality improvement initiative was to examine the feasibility and acceptability of our program. Sessions were administered virtually by a licensed clinical addiction specialist. We collected data from the electronic health record, patient survey data, and qualitative feedback via a focus group at program completion. Of 46 patients contacted, 41% (n = 19) completed initial enrollment, and 30% (n = 14) attended at least one session. The majority of patients (61%) were male and those who enrolled were transplanted more recently (15 versus 26 months post-LT). Attendance was higher in patients with private insurance and a diagnosis of alcohol-associated hepatitis. Our program was well-received overall by participants, as seen in both patient satisfaction scores and qualitative feedback. Although focus group participants felt the program was not essential for maintaining abstinence, largely due to an already established commitment to abstinence, they valued the sense of community and purpose it provided. With rising ALD burden and broader access to urgent LT, structured and accessible posttransplant AUD interventions remain an important and unmet need.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.