ArticlePloS one2026
Estimation method of attentional object using spatial frequency selectivity in pupillary response.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study investigates pupillary dynamics associated with object-based visual attention using two overlaid filtered icon images (hybrid stimulus). Subjects were presented with the hybrid stimulus and instructed to maintain their attention on one of the icon images while the spatial frequency (HSF: High spatial frequency or LSF: Low spatial frequency) components of the two images alternated periodically, where they had different components from each other. Pupil diameter was continuously recorded during the alternations. The combination of motion conditions (static or dynamic) of the icon images in the hybrid stimulus was manipulated. Results revealed that pupil size was relatively small when the spatial frequency component of the attentional icon image was HSF and tended to constrict as the spatial frequency component of the attentional icon image changed from LSF to HSF. In contrast, pupil size was relatively large when the spatial frequency component of the attentional icon image was LSF and tended to dilate when the icon image changed from HSF to LSF. These pupil size changes were particularly prominent under the combination of two dynamic or one dynamic and one static icon images. Based on these findings, a method to infer the attended icon image using pupil size change was proposed. The accuracy of the inference method exceeded 70% in specific conditions, suggesting its feasibility as an attention-based information input system for users with limited motor capabilities.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.