Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42671865›Full record

ArticleJAMA neurology2026

Tirofiban for Branch Atheromatous Disease-Related Stroke: The STRATEGY Randomized Clinical Trial.

Yicong Wang, Xiaoling Liao, Shuo Feng, Yuesong Pan, Xuan Wang, Hui Qu, Yuetong Liu, Cong Gao, Xinru Liu, Qianqian Yang and 13 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05310968 (Study on Tirofiban With Aspirin in the Treatment of Acute Penetrating Artery Territory Infarction), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05310968 phase4completednot on this map

Study on Tirofiban With Aspirin in the Treatment of Acute Penetrating Artery Territory Infarction (STRATEGY)

TypeinterventionalSponsorBeijing Tiantan HospitalRan2022 to 2025Enrolled970ConditionsBranch Atheromatous DiseaseArmsTirofiban hydrochloride sodium chloride injection, Tirofiban hydrochloride sodium chloride injection placebo, Aspirin
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Yicong WangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xiaoling LiaoDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Shuo FengDepartment of Neurology, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.
Yuesong PanDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xuan WangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Hui QuDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yuetong LiuDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Cong GaoDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xinru LiuDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Qianqian YangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Meiyang ZhangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhangxinyi LiuDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jinyi YeDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yuke MaoDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Weiqi ChenDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Lingling JiangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Philip M BathStroke Trials Unit, Mental Health & Clinical Neuroscience, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
S Claiborne JohnstonUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Guillaume TurcINSERM U1266, Institute of Psychiatry and Neuroscience of Paris (IPNP), Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
Xingquan ZhaoDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yongjun WangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yilong WangDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
STRATEGY Investigators

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Patients with branch atheromatous disease (BAD)-related stroke are predisposed to early neurological deterioration (END) and disability. However, large-scale clinical trials focused on the prevention of the deterioration and recurrent stroke in this population are currently lacking. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of intensive antiplatelet therapy combining the tirofiban with aspirin for patients with BAD-related stroke. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized clinical trial was the multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled STRATEGY trial, conducted across 38 hospitals in China. Participants were patients with BAD-related acute ischemic stroke confirmed by magnetic resonance imaging within 48 hours of symptom onset were eligible for enrollment. Enrollment occurred from November 15, 2022, to November 19, 2024, with a 90-day follow-up period for all participants. Investigators, patients, and outcome assessors were blinded to treatment assignment. Interventions: Eligible participants were randomized to receive either intravenous tirofiban or placebo (0.4 µg/kg/min for 30 minutes followed by 0.1 µg/kg/min for 24 hours). All patients received a 300-mg loading dose of aspirin on the day of randomization, followed by 100 mg daily until day 90. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy end point was END within 7 days or new stroke within 90 days. The primary safety end point was moderate or severe bleeding. Results: Of 1378 patients with acute ischemic stroke screened for eligibility, 408 were excluded for ineligible imaging findings, other exclusion criteria, lack of consent, or additional reasons, leaving 970 participants who underwent randomization (486 assigned to tirofiban plus aspirin, 484 to placebo plus aspirin). The median (IQR) age was 63.0 (56.0-70.0) years; 607 patients (62.6%) were male and 363 (37.4%) female. The incidence of the primary efficacy end point was 79 patients (17.1%) in the tirofiban group and 89 (19.6%) in the placebo group (hazard ratio, 0.88; 95% CI, 0.65-1.19; P = .39). The incidence of the primary safety end point was 1 of 486 patients (0.2%) in the tirofiban group and 0 patients in the placebo group (P > .99). Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that in patients with BAD-related stroke, intravenous tirofiban combined with aspirin did not significantly reduce the risk of END or stroke compared with aspirin alone, nor was it associated with an increased risk of moderate or severe bleeding. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05310968.

Identifiers

PMID42671865
PMCPMC13531381

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.