Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42671784›Full record

ReviewDrugs & aging2026

Management of Urinary Retention in Older Women.

Rachna Sridhar, Joanna Marantidis, Anne P Cameron

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Drugs & aging, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rachna SridharSchool of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Joanna MarantidisDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Anne P CameronDepartment of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. annepell@med.umich.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7958-1749

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Urinary retention in older women is a clinically significant and often underdiagnosed condition with complex and multifactorial etiology. Age-related changes in bladder contractile function and bladder sensation, combined with common comorbidities such as neurologic disease, diabetic bladder dysfunction, and pelvic organ prolapse, substantially increase the risk of retention in this population. Medications commonly prescribed to older adults, including anticholinergics and antidepressants, are an often overlooked cause of urinary retention. Evaluation includes a thorough history, physical exam, medication reconciliation, and post-void residual volume, especially because symptoms of retention that are common in men are often non-specific in women. Management should be risk stratified, with acute retention requiring prompt bladder drainage and chronic urinary retention requiring assessment of symptom burden and risk of upper tract deterioration. Pharmacologic treatment options, such as alpha-blockers, have limited evidence in women and broader therapeutic options remain poorly studied in older female populations. Sacral neuromodulation can be effective for non-obstructive urinary retention in older women. This review highlights the critical need for sex-specific and age-specific trials to guide evidence-based patient-centered management of urinary retention in older women.

Identifiers

PMID42671784

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.