ArticleInfection2026
Effect of kidney function on drug concentrations of first-line anti-tubercular treatment.
Article in Infection, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTuberculosis (TB) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are interconnected global health concerns. CKD patients have a higher risk of developing TB. Decreased clearance of drugs in kidney disease enhances toxicity risk. Current guidance on medication doses is not based on therapeutic drug monitoring. We measured and compared the concentrations of first-line anti-TB drugs in CKD and those with normal kidney function.
methodsA prospective observational study was conducted from September 2020 to December 2023. Patients with microbiologically confirmed tuberculosis were included, and drug concentrations were determined by using Liquid Chromatography-Tandem Mass Spectrometer (LC-MS/MS) and compared between CKD and those with normal kidney function.
resultsOf 151 participants, 51 had CKD. Higher trough concentrations were found in CKD for isoniazid [697.15 ng/mL (IQR 199.07-3321.68) vs. 187.58 ng/mL (IQR 95.56-323.65), P < 0.0001], rifampicin [141.53 ng/mL (IQR 40.86-730.66) vs. 33.24 ng/mL (IQR 22.49-86.20), P < 0.0001], and ethambutol [635.67 ng/mL (IQR 264.38-1594.12) vs. 230.92 ng/mL (IQR 161.95-417.22), P < 0.0001], while pyrazinamide level [1469.79 ng/mL (IQR 0.00-5160.53) vs. 4273.94 ng/mL (IQR 2151.29-8023.81), P = 0.002] was higher in those with normal kidney function. At 2-hours, a greater number of CKD patients had below the reference threshold for rifampicin [33/51 (64.7%) vs. 48/100 (48%), P = 0.059] and pyrazinamide [39/40 (97.5%) vs. 29/91 (31.8%), P < 0.0001].
conclusionCKD affects anti-tubercular drug concentrations, highlighting the need for therapeutic drug monitoring. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2020/09/027951.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42671774What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.