ArticleWiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946)2026
Prevalence of low back pain-related disability in postpartum women in Slovakia.
Article in Wiener medizinische Wochenschrift (1946), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThere is currently a lack of research focusing on pain-related functional impairment during the postpartum period. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of low back pain (LBP)-related disability among postpartum women in the Slovak Republic and to examine the relationship between LBP-related disability, pelvic girdle pain (PGP), and pelvic floor discomfort.
methodsThis cross-sectional study included 791 women between 12 weeks and 1 year postpartum. Data were collected using the standardised Slovak versions of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Pelvic Girdle Questionnaire (PGQ), and Pelvic Floor Impact Questionnaire-Short Form 7 (PFIQ-7), all of which demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α > 0.9).
resultsThe mean age of the participants was 31.43 years. The sample was dichotomised using the standard ODI cut-off score of 20% to identify clinically relevant LBP-related disability; 224 women met this criterion, whereas 567 did not. Among women with clinically relevant LBP-related disability, the PFIQ‑7 and PGQ scores indicated relatively low absolute levels of pelvic floor and pelvic girdle discomfort, suggesting only modest clinical effect sizes. The overall prevalence of clinically relevant LBP-related disability, as measured by the ODI, was 28.3%, ranging from 23.7% to 50.0% across age groups.
conclusionApproximately one in four women in the study population experienced clinically relevant LBP-related disability. Although a significant association was observed between LBP-related functional impairment, PGP, and pelvic floor discomfort, the cross-sectional study design precludes any conclusions regarding causality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42671763What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.