Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42671718›Full record

ReviewBrazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology]2026

Use of beneficial microorganisms in bean cultivation: strategies employed to increase productivity.

Matheus Messias, Jerri Édson Zilli, Luis Henrique de Barros Soares, Enderson Petrônio de Brito Ferreira, Veronica Massena Reis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brazilian journal of microbiology : [publication of the Brazilian Society for Microbiology], 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Matheus MessiasPostgraduate Program in Agronomy, Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. messyas023@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6504-3904
Jerri Édson ZilliEmbrapa Agrobiologia, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2138-3488
Luis Henrique de Barros SoaresEmbrapa Clima Temperado, Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6931-6773
Enderson Petrônio de Brito FerreiraEmbrapa Arroz e Feijão, Santo Antônio de Goiás, Goiás, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1964-1516
Veronica Massena ReisEmbrapa Agrobiologia, Seropédica, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2149-7725

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The common bean is of great importance for human nutrition worldwide as its grain is a cheap source of protein, but it has a high-cost production system due to the use of synthetic inputs such as nitrogen fertilizers and pest and disease control products. An alternative to promote the sustainability of the production system and increase crop productivity is the use of co-inoculation of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) to reduce and/or replace the use of nitrogen fertilizers and pest and disease control products. Since 2010, Brazil has stood out on the international stage with research focused on the application of rhizobia combined with PGPR in bean crops. Currently, the use of microorganisms that effectively promote plant growth through different mechanisms of action is already a consolidated reality in Brazil, with experimental results proven by years of research. Despite these advances, there are still challenges to overcome to maximize the potential of co-inoculation in bean crops. These include the need to develop more efficient formulations containing elite microbial strains and optimized microbial consortia, as well as the search for inoculation methods that optimize root colonization by the bacteria and maximize their beneficial effects on the plant. In this review, we discuss the history of common-bean production and the types and doses of inoculants marketed, as well as the challenges for the efficiency of co-inoculation and for the development of inoculants of rhizobial consortia with PGPRs for the common-bean cultivation.

Indexed as

Agricultural InoculantsBacteriaFabaceaePhaseolusRhizobiumBrazilCrops, AgriculturalFertilizersPlant RootsSoil MicrobiologyFertilizersCo-inoculationInoculantPGPRsPhaseolus vulgarisRhizobium

Identifiers

PMID42671718
PMCPMC13530100

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.