ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2026
Echo Chambers: Bias and Representation in Cardiac Imaging Datasets for Artificial Intelligence.
Review in Current cardiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewWe examined the landscape of publicly available cardiac imaging datasets to assess how their distribution and construction shape bias and equity in cardiovascular AI. RECENT
findingsAcross 38 publicly available echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and cardiac computed tomography datasets, nearly 80% originate from high-income countries, with no public cardiac imaging datasets from Africa or South America. Fewer than two-thirds of these public datasets report any demographic information, and only a small minority are linked to clinical outcomes. Studies reveal consistent gaps in model performance across racial and ethnic groups, substantial variability in labeling and disease definitions, and strong evidence that harmonization and label quality often improve performance more than changes in model architecture. Cardiovascular AI developed using publicly available cardiac imaging datasets is largely constructed on geographically narrow, demographically uncharacterized data from well-resourced health systems. This creates an "echo chamber" that may limit representation of the global majority within publicly available data resources. While these findings are specific to publicly available datasets and may not necessarily extend to private or commercial data resources, they highlight the importance of considering equitable data infrastructure, prioritizing globally representative outcome-linked datasets and local capacity building.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42671712What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.