Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42671712›Full record

ReviewCurrent cardiology reports2026

Echo Chambers: Bias and Representation in Cardiac Imaging Datasets for Artificial Intelligence.

Rahul Gorijavolu, Nikhil Jaiswal, Jayanth S Pratap, Kaushik Madapati, María Del Pilar Arias López, Marianna Leite, Denise Priscila Muwanguzi, Nura Izath, Konrad Samsel, Ifeoluwa T Shoyombo and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current cardiology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Rahul GorijavoluSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Nikhil JaiswalLaboratory for Computational Physiology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA.
Jayanth S PratapSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kaushik MadapatiArtificial Intelligence for Responsible, Generalizable, and Open Surgical Research Group, Baltimore, MD, USA.
María Del Pilar Arias LópezUnidad de Cuidados Intensivos Pediátricos (UCIP) del Hospital de Niños Ricardo Gutiérrez, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Marianna LeiteSchool of Medicine, Santa Marcelina College, São Paulo, Brazil.
Denise Priscila MuwanguziDepartment of Computing and Technology, Uganda Christian University, Mukono, Uganda.
Nura IzathDepartment of Software and Informatics Engineering, Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
Konrad SamselInstitute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ifeoluwa T ShoyomboSchool of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Leo Anthony CeliLaboratory for Computational Physiology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. lceli@mit.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6712-6626

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewWe examined the landscape of publicly available cardiac imaging datasets to assess how their distribution and construction shape bias and equity in cardiovascular AI. RECENT

findingsAcross 38 publicly available echocardiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and cardiac computed tomography datasets, nearly 80% originate from high-income countries, with no public cardiac imaging datasets from Africa or South America. Fewer than two-thirds of these public datasets report any demographic information, and only a small minority are linked to clinical outcomes. Studies reveal consistent gaps in model performance across racial and ethnic groups, substantial variability in labeling and disease definitions, and strong evidence that harmonization and label quality often improve performance more than changes in model architecture. Cardiovascular AI developed using publicly available cardiac imaging datasets is largely constructed on geographically narrow, demographically uncharacterized data from well-resourced health systems. This creates an "echo chamber" that may limit representation of the global majority within publicly available data resources. While these findings are specific to publicly available datasets and may not necessarily extend to private or commercial data resources, they highlight the importance of considering equitable data infrastructure, prioritizing globally representative outcome-linked datasets and local capacity building.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCardiac Imaging TechniquesCardiovascular DiseasesDatasets as TopicEchocardiographyBiasHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingTomography, X-Ray ComputedArtificial intelligence (AI)BiasCardiac computed tomography (CT)Cardiac Imaging TechniquesCardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR)EchocardiographyImaging datasets

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.