ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Implementation and preliminary clinical application of a robotic thoracic telesurgery program in a middle-income country: a structured pathway from simulation to clinical practice.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Telesurgery may help overcome geographic disparities in access to specialized surgical care. Although recent studies confirm the technical feasibility of robotic thoracic telesurgery, most reports originate from highly controlled settings, and practical implementation within public healthcare systems remains scarce. We describe the development and preliminary clinical application of a robotic thoracic telesurgery program in a middle-income country, reported as a proof-of-implementation case series rather than a statistically validated model. A robotic thoracic telesurgery program was developed connecting the University of São Paulo Medical School (FMUSP) and University Hospital (HU-USP), approximately 10 km apart, using the Toumai® platform over the institutional fiber-optic network. Development included infrastructure deployment, preclinical network validation (28 robotic surgeons), safety-protocol development, and team training, culminating in two remotely performed procedures under a pre-defined, manufacturer-limited case allocation. A robotic wedge resection for pulmonary metastasis and a robotic left upper trisegmentectomy with systematic lymphadenectomy were completed entirely under remote control, with the surgeon at FMUSP and the patient at HU-USP. Neither procedure had communication interruptions, packet loss, conversion events, or intraoperative complications; maximum latency did not exceed 12 milliseconds. Chest tubes were removed on postoperative day 1 in both patients, with discharge on day 1 and 2, respectively. This early experience supports the technical feasibility of introducing robotic thoracic telesurgery within a public healthcare system through a structured implementation pathway. Given the small sample, conclusions remain preliminary; the model's value lies not in extending distance, but in outlining a reproducible process for expanding access to specialized surgical expertise.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.