ReviewJournal of robotic surgery2026
Dose control in robot-assisted seed brachytherapy: challenges, current status, and future directions.
Review in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Seed brachytherapy treats a range of localized solid tumors, where efficacy and normal-tissue sparing depend on precise dose control. Advancing it from geometry-controlled execution toward autonomous, dose-controlled delivery is obstructed by the irreversibility of implantation: once released, a seed fixes its dosimetric contribution permanently. Errors arising from plan-to-anatomy mismatch, placement imprecision, and limited intraoperative assessment therefore become embedded in the realized dose distribution, beyond postoperative correction. Correction is available only during the procedure, which places the robot in the path from a computed dose strategy to a verified outcome. Real-time imaging aids visualization, yet the feedback it supports falls short in resolution, in latency, or in its coupling to execution, and does not close the loop. This narrative review maps the technologies for robot-assisted closed-loop dose control onto a five-layer control architecture. The architecture is organized around robotic execution as the physical core of the loop (actuation), together with the layers built upon it: intraoperative sensing and anatomical updating (perception); real-time dose computation (computation); adaptive replanning (decision); formal safety assurance (supervision). Each layer has advanced, though none has reached the threshold for clinical deployment. We identify the bottlenecks and propose a roadmap driven by real-time seed localization resolved for orientation, intraoperative contour recovery, near-real-time dose surrogates, irreversibility-aware replanning, and formally verifiable safety architectures. Beyond brachytherapy, these requirements point toward verifiable autonomy in image-guided interventional surgery, where irreversible actions require robotic execution under provable safety guarantees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42671665What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.