ReviewJournal of gastrointestinal cancer2026
BRAF V600E-Mutated Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: Practical Management in the Post-BREAKWATER Era.
Review in Journal of gastrointestinal cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionBRAF V600E-mutated metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is a biologically distinct subtype characterized by right-sided predominance, frequent overlap with serrated-pathway biology, and historically poor outcomes with conventional chemotherapy. Therapeutic progress has been driven by the recognition that BRAF inhibition alone is inadequate in colorectal cancer because adaptive epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mediated feedback rapidly restores MAPK signaling.
methodsThis narrative review evaluates the clinical development and practical integration of BRAF-targeted therapy in BRAF V600E-mutated mCRC, with particular emphasis on first-line treatment, MMR/MSI status, patient fitness, and treatment sequencing in the post-BREAKWATER era.
resultsCombined BRAF and EGFR inhibition established encorafenib plus cetuximab as a standard option after prior therapy. The phase 3 BREAKWATER program has now moved BRAF-targeted treatment into first-line practice by demonstrating improved outcomes with encorafenib plus cetuximab combined with fluoropyrimidine-basedchemotherapy, including mFOLFOX6 and FOLFIRI backbones. These data define a chemo-targeted approach for fit patients with non-MSI-H/dMMR disease. For MSI-H/dMMR tumors, first-line immune checkpoint blockade should be prioritized irrespective of BRAF V600E status unless immunotherapy is absolutely contraindicated.
conclusionImportant uncertainties remain regarding whether BRAF/EGFR targeting should be added to immunotherapy in MSI-H/dMMR disease, as well as the management of frail or oxaliplatin-ineligible patients, maintenance therapy, local treatment integration, and sequencing after frontline encorafenib exposure. Treatment selection in the post- BREAKWATER era should therefore integrate molecular context, patient fitness, and remaining evidence gaps.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42671662What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.