Observational studyNeurogenetics2026
PMP22 gene diagnostic testing in Southwest Finland in 2005-2020. An observational, register-based study.
Observational study in Neurogenetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Pathogenic variants of PMP22 cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1 A (CMT1A) and hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP). As CMT1A is the most common inherited neuropathy and the most common pathogenic PMP22 variants are duplications and deletions, focused analysis of this gene remains relevant in the era of large gene panels and exome studies. We investigated the use and findings of PMP22 gene analyses carried out at Turku University Hospital (TUH; Turku, Finland) in 2005-2020. Using the electronic medical record system at TUH, we identified all patients who underwent PMP22 genetic diagnostic testing in 2005-2020. Data on testing indication, clinical features, relevant family history, genetic testing results, and final neurological diagnoses were collected. Out of total 244 tests, 64 (26%) provided a diagnostic finding. The diagnostic yield was 33% for PMP22 deletions that were the most common variants (58%), and 23% for PMP22 duplications. Highest yield (45%) was in patients with both clinical presentation and family history suggestive of a genetic neuropathy. The yearly diagnostic incidence of PMP22 related neuropathies during the study period was 0.89/100 000; 0.6/100 000 for PMP22 deletions and 0.4/100 000 for PMP22 duplications. In clinical diagnostic use of the PMP22 gene analyses, the majority of diagnostic findings were related to HNPP rather than CMT1A. We suggest that HNPP merits more research attention.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.