Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42671656›Full record

Observational studyNeurogenetics2026

PMP22 gene diagnostic testing in Southwest Finland in 2005-2020. An observational, register-based study.

Pii M Pankakoski, Mika H Martikainen

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Neurogenetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Pii M PankakoskiClinical Neurosciences, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland. pii.m.pankakoski@utu.fi.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-8800-5775
Mika H MartikainenClinical Neurosciences, Turku University Hospital, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pathogenic variants of PMP22 cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 1 A (CMT1A) and hereditary neuropathy with liability to pressure palsies (HNPP). As CMT1A is the most common inherited neuropathy and the most common pathogenic PMP22 variants are duplications and deletions, focused analysis of this gene remains relevant in the era of large gene panels and exome studies. We investigated the use and findings of PMP22 gene analyses carried out at Turku University Hospital (TUH; Turku, Finland) in 2005-2020. Using the electronic medical record system at TUH, we identified all patients who underwent PMP22 genetic diagnostic testing in 2005-2020. Data on testing indication, clinical features, relevant family history, genetic testing results, and final neurological diagnoses were collected. Out of total 244 tests, 64 (26%) provided a diagnostic finding. The diagnostic yield was 33% for PMP22 deletions that were the most common variants (58%), and 23% for PMP22 duplications. Highest yield (45%) was in patients with both clinical presentation and family history suggestive of a genetic neuropathy. The yearly diagnostic incidence of PMP22 related neuropathies during the study period was 0.89/100 000; 0.6/100 000 for PMP22 deletions and 0.4/100 000 for PMP22 duplications. In clinical diagnostic use of the PMP22 gene analyses, the majority of diagnostic findings were related to HNPP rather than CMT1A. We suggest that HNPP merits more research attention.

Indexed as

ArthrogryposisCharcot-Marie-Tooth DiseaseGenetic TestingHereditary Sensory and Motor NeuropathyMyelin ProteinsAdolescentAdultChildFemaleFinlandGene DuplicationHumansMaleRegistriesMyelin ProteinsPMP22 protein, humanCMT1Genetic testingHNPPPMP22

Identifiers

PMID42671656
PMCPMC13529889

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.