ArticleFunctional & integrative genomics2026
An integrative multi-project transcriptomic and structural prediction framework identifies candidate cold-responsive transcription factors in Medicago sativa.
Article in Functional & integrative genomics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cold stress limits alfalfa (Medicago sativa) growth and persistence, but public transcriptomic datasets differ widely in genotype, tissue, treatment duration, and experimental design. We integrated RNA-seq data from ten independent BioProjects using a common processing workflow while retaining project-specific structures. A recurrent contrast-level DEG-derived pool of 4,354 genes was ranked by random forest using expression profiles from 240 samples. The original model showed strong internal discrimination (OOB ROC-AUC = 0.937), whereas fully nested leave-one-BioProject-out validation yielded an accuracy of 0.729, balanced accuracy of 0.676, and ROC-AUC of 0.727. PlantTFDB annotation identified MsG0680033896.01, MsG0680033848.01, and MsG0480021906.01 as the three highest-ranked transcription factors. The first two candidates showed greater stability in project-held-out and alternative machine-learning analyses. In project-aware multilevel meta-analysis, neither the primary 50-contrast analysis nor the 54-contrast sensitivity analysis identified genome-wide significant transcripts after Benjamini-Hochberg correction. However, MsG0680033896.01 and MsG0680033848.01 showed predominantly positive effects, positive pooled estimates, and confidence intervals excluding zero in both analyses, whereas MsG0480021906.01 showed weaker directional consistency. Co-expression, promoter prediction, chromosomal localization, and AlphaFold3 modeling provided additional computational context, including localization of the two leading candidates within a Chr6 CBF/DREB1-like-enriched region. These results prioritize MsG0680033896.01 and MsG0680033848.01 as high-confidence computational candidates and retain MsG0480021906.01 as an additional project-sensitive candidate for future functional testing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42671643What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.