SynthesisWorld journal of urology2026
Pelvic floor muscle training for erectile function in men undergoing radical prostatectomy: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials.
Synthesis in World journal of urology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveWe aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT), with or without adjunctive biofeedback or electrical stimulation, in improving erectile function (EF) in men who have undergone radical prostatectomy (RP) for prostate cancer, by examining randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
methodsPubMed, Scopus and Web of Science databases were systematically searched. Eligible studies were RCTs examining PFMT for post-RP erectile dysfunction (ED) according to predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251162740).
resultsTwelve RCTs were included in the final analysis. PFMT-related effects on EF were inconsistent: four RCTs reported statistically significant EF benefits, one multimodal survivorship trial showed a favorable surgery-subgroup sexual-domain signal, and seven found no significant between-group EF difference. Across trials with extractable mean IIEF/IIEF-5 endpoint data, between-group differences ranged from - 0.97 to + 2.18 points, with a maximum change-score advantage of + 4.3 points. Selected favorable findings included higher 12-month potency rate after biofeedback-assisted PFMT (47.1% vs. 12.5%) and higher 15-month IIEF-EF scores after supervised PFMT initiated at 12 months for persistent ED (11.1 ± 8.8 vs. 9.3 ± 7.1; p = 0.025). Evidence quality was limited by substantial clinical and methodological heterogeneity and risk-of-bias concerns.
conclusionsPFMT may improve EF through enhancing the structural support for erections and the hemodynamic erectile response after RP. Men who prefer a holistic approach may benefit from PFMT as part of a multimodal rehabilitation program. Further research to clarify the role of PFMT in EF recovery after RP is needed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42671634What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.