Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42671633›Full record

ArticleBiodegradation2026

Functional metabolite signatures reveal biochemical recovery trajectories in oil-polluted soils undergoing bioremediation.

Laura N Nwogu-Chigozie, Chioma B Chikere, Victor Ezebuiro, Fidele Tugizimana, Musiwalo S Mulaudzi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biodegradation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Laura N Nwogu-ChigozieWorld Bank Africa Centre of Excellence in Oilfield Chemicals Research (ACE-CEFOR), University of Port Harcourt, PMB 5323 Choba, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria. laura.nwoguchigozie@gmail.com.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6658-0026
Chioma B ChikereDepartment of Microbiology, University of Port Harcourt, PMB 5323 Choba, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.
Victor EzebuiroRegional Centre for Biotechnology and Bioresources Research, University of Port Harcourt, East-West Road, Choba, Port Harcourt, Rivers State, Nigeria.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8944-879X
Fidele TugizimanaDepartment of Biochemistry, Research Centre for Plant Metabolomics, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, South Africa.
Musiwalo S MulaudziDepartment of Biochemistry, Research Centre for Plant Metabolomics, University of Johannesburg, Auckland Park, Johannesburg, South Africa.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable candidate indicators of recovery following petroleum contamination remain limited, as remediation success is commonly assessed using hydrocarbon removal alone rather than restoration of soil characteristics. This study integrated physicochemical profiling with untargeted liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) metabolomics to resolve biochemical recovery trajectories across polluted soil (PS), soil undergoing bioremediation (UB), bioremediated soil (BS), and uncontaminated reference soil (CNTR) in Ogoniland, Nigeria. Total petroleum hydrocarbon (TPH) concentrations decreased progressively from 78.26 ± 6.04 mg/kg in PS to 41.23 ± 1.40 mg/kg in UB and 23.38 ± 1.81 mg/kg in BS, corresponding to an overall 70.1% reduction in BS relative to the PS. Sulphur decreased from 6.36 ± 0.70 wt% to 0.152 ± 0.052 wt%, whereas phosphorus increased from 0.068 ± 0.006 wt% to 0.325 ± 0.025 wt% after remediation. Principal component analysis of physicochemical variables explained 99.3% of total variance and resolved a directional restoration gradient (PS → UB → BS → CNTR). Untargeted metabolomics similarly separated treatment states, with PCA explaining 73.7% of total biochemical variance. Polluted and transitional soils were enriched in aromatic stress metabolites, including fluorene, triphenylphosphine oxide, quinolinic acid, and 2,4-dinitrophenol, whereas remediated soils accumulated recovery-associated metabolites such as citric acid, aconitic acid, ectoine, pyridoxamine, lipoic acid, and geranic acid. Integrated analyses showed strong positive correlations between TPH and fluorene (r = 0.88) and Triphenylphosphine oxide (TPPO) (r = 0.84), but negative correlations with citric acid (r = -0.82) and pyridoxamine (r = -0.78). These results demonstrate that hydrocarbon attenuation is tightly coupled to coordinated metabolic reprogramming and nutrient restoration. Functional metabolite signatures may provide a framework for the assessment of biochemical changes associated with soil recovery following petroleum contamination. Thus, our study demonstrates coordinated physicochemical and metabolomic shifts associated with soil recovery during bioremediation.

Indexed as

PetroleumPetroleum PollutionSoil PollutantsBiodegradation, EnvironmentalHydrocarbonsLiquid Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryMetabolomeMetabolomicsSoilSoil MicrobiologyHydrocarbonsPetroleumSoilSoil PollutantsBiochemical recoveryBioremediationMetabolomicsPetroleum-contaminated soilPhysicochemical restorationRecovery-associated metabolite

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.