ArticleBiological cybernetics2026
De novo motor learning as controller synthesis: a conceptual framework.
Article in Biological cybernetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Most studies of motor learning focus on adaptation, which can be described as recalibration within an existing controller following changes in dynamics, kinematics, or sensory feedback. In these paradigms, control variables, coordinate representations, and feedback organization are treated as available a priori, and learning as parameter tuning within a specified controller architecture. However, de novo motor-learning tasks require learners to establish novel relationships between intention, sensory feedback, and action, rather than merely recalibrating a familiar control organization. These tasks often show slow or variable acquisition, selective and task-dependent generalization, strong context dependence, and dissociations between learning rate and final performance. Such features are difficult to explain solely as parameter tuning within a fixed controller architecture. Here we propose that de novo motor learning is better understood as controller synthesis, rather than only as parameter adaptation. On this view, learning involves forming and stabilizing content-addressable, plant-state-addressed controller memories: local sensorimotor control organizations that specify where a controller applies, which task-relevant signals are selected and routed, how state and progress are estimated, how control is computed, how internal control signals map onto action, and when and how the controller is expressed. This framework interprets slow or variable acquisition, structured generalization, context dependence, and learning-rate/outcome dissociations as possible consequences of controller-memory formation, stabilization, retrieval, and expression, rather than of slow parameter convergence within an established controller. It also suggests tests for distinguishing controller synthesis from fixed-structure alternatives based on adaptation, contextual inference, or policy learning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42671605What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.