ArticleEuropean archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery2026
The safety and clinical outcomes of open tracheostomy performed by residents in an academic center: A retrospective cohort study.
Article in European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundOpen surgical tracheostomy is a fundamental airway procedure in otolaryngology and an essential component of surgical training. Balancing resident autonomy with patient safety remains a central challenge in academic practice. Evidence evaluating outcomes across different levels of resident experience and supervision remains limited.
methodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted at a tertiary academic center including all open tracheostomy procedures performed between January 2020 and December 2023. Procedures were categorized according to operator seniority as attending surgeons, senior residents (≥ 48 months of training), and junior residents (< 48 months). Subgroup analyses evaluated the impact of supervision during resident-performed procedures. The primary outcome was postoperative complications. Secondary outcomes included operative duration, mortality, and survival. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of complications, and Kaplan-Meier analysis assessed survival.
resultsA total of 288 tracheostomy procedures were included: 81 (28.1%) performed by attending surgeons, 82 (28.5%) by senior residents, and 125 (43.4%) by junior residents. Overall postoperative complications occurred in 47 patients (16.3%) and were not associated with operator seniority (p = 0.133). In multivariable analysis, diabetes (OR 4.76, p = 0.043) and prior neck surgery (OR 16.22, p = 0.022) independently predicted complications, whereas operator seniority did not. Among resident-performed procedures, complication rates were similar between supervised and unsupervised cases (13.3% vs 15.5%, p = 0.592). Operative duration, complications, and 30-day mortality did not differ across supervision groups. Early tracheostomy (≤ 7 days after intubation) was associated with improved survival.
conclusionResident-performed open tracheostomy demonstrates outcomes comparable to attending surgeons, regardless of supervision status. These findings support structured training models allowing graduated resident autonomy while maintaining patient safety. Patient factors and tracheostomy timing appear more influential determinants of outcomes than operator experience.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42671600What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.